扫一扫
分享文章到微信
扫一扫
关注官方公众号
至顶头条
作者:论坛整理 来源:ZDNet网络安全 2007年12月27日
关键字: telnet命令 opentelnet linux telnet telnet入侵 telnet telnet端口
Network Working Group J. Postel
Request for Comments: 859 J. Reynolds
ISI
Obsoletes: RFC651(NIC 31154) May 1983
TELNETSTATUS OPTION
This RFCspecifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community. Hosts on the ARPA Internet are expected to adopt and implement this standard.
1. Command Name and Code
STATUS 5
2. Command Meanings
This option applies separately to each direction of data flow.
IAC DON'T STATUS
Sender refuses to carry on any further discussion of the current status of options.
IAC WON'T STATUS
Sender refuses to carry on any further discussion of the current status of options.
IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SE
Sender requests receiver to transmit his (the receiver's) perception of the current status of Telnet options. The code for SEND is 1. (See below.)
IAC SB STATUS IS ... IAC SE
Sender is stating his perception of the current status of Telnet options. The code for IS is 0. (See below.)
3. Default
DON'T STATUS, WON'T STATUS
The current status of options will not be discussed.
4. Motivation for the Option
This option allows a user/process to verify the current status of TELNET options (e.g., echoing) as viewed by the person/process on the other end of the TELNET connection. Simply renegotiating options RFC859May 1983 could lead to the nonterminating request loop problem discussed in the General Consideration section of the TELNET Specification. This option fits into the normal structure of TELNET options by deferring the actual transfer of status information to the SB command.
5. Description of the Option
WILL and DO are used only to obtain and grant permission for future discussion. The actual exchange of status information occurs within option subcommands (IAC SB STATUS...).
Once the two hosts have exchanged a WILL and a DO, the sender of the WILL STATUS is free to transmit status information, spontaneously or in response to a request from the sender of the DO. At worst, this may lead to transmitting the information twice. Only the sender of the DO may send requests (IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SE) and only the sender of the WILL may transmit actual status information (within an IAC SB STATUS IS ... IAC SE command).
IS has the subcommands WILL, DO and SB. They are used EXACTLY as used during the actual negotiation of TELNET options, except that SB is terminated with SE, rather than IAC SE. Transmission of SE, as a regular data byte, is accomplished by doubling the byte (SE SE).
Options that are not explicitly described are assumed to be in their default states. A single IAC SB STATUS IS ... IAC SE describes the condition of ALL options.
RFC859May 1983
The following is an example of use of the option:
Host1: IAC DO STATUS
Host2: IAC WILL STATUS
(Host2 is now free to send status information at any time.
Solicitations from Host1 are NOT necessary. This should not produce any dangerous race conditions. At worst, two IS's will be sent.)
Host1 (perhaps): IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SE
Host2 (the following stream is broken into multiple lines only for readability. No carriage returns are implied.):
IAC SB STATUS IS
WILL ECHO
DO SUPPRESS-GO-AHEAD
WILL STATUS
DO STATUS
IAC SE
Explanation of Host2's perceptions: It is responsible for echoing back the data characters it receives over the TELNET connection; it will not send Go-Ahead signals; it will both issue and request Status information.
如果您非常迫切的想了解IT领域最新产品与技术信息,那么订阅至顶网技术邮件将是您的最佳途径之一。
现场直击|2021世界人工智能大会
直击5G创新地带,就在2021MWC上海
5G已至 转型当时——服务提供商如何把握转型的绝佳时机
寻找自己的Flag
华为开发者大会2020(Cloud)- 科技行者