科技行者

行者学院 转型私董会 科技行者专题报道 网红大战科技行者

知识库

知识库 安全导航

至顶网网络频道July, 1975, survey of New-Protocol Telnet Servers

July, 1975, survey of New-Protocol Telnet Servers

  • 扫一扫
    分享文章到微信

  • 扫一扫
    关注官方公众号
    至顶头条

In the nearly five months since the last report several new server sites have joined the network and there has been some significant progress in New-Protocol implementation.

作者:论坛整理 来源:ZDNet网络安全 2007年12月28日

关键字: telnet命令 opentelnet linux telnet telnet入侵 telnet telnet端口

  • 评论
  • 分享微博
  • 分享邮件

  Network Working Group D.W. Dodds

  RFC# 703 BBN-TENEXA

  NIC # 32988 11 July, 1975

  July, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol TELNETServers

  In the nearly five months since the last report several new server sites have joined the network and there has been some significant progress in New-Protocol implementation. Perhaps the New-Protocol implementation on the TIPs scheduled for the end of the year will encourage further progress in the near future.

  There have been numerous changes since the last list (numbers in octal):

  SRI-ARC (2) is no longer a server host;

  MIT-AI (206), MIT-ML (306), LONDON (52), and OFFICE-1 (53) have added New-Protocol servers;

  LLL-RISOS (25), SDAC-44 (32), and ARPA-DMS (34) have joined the network; SCI-TENEX (55), Rutgers-10 (56), USC-ISIC (364), and SUMEX-AIM (70) have joined the network with New-Protocol servers.

  The following is the latest version* of the summary and tabulation of server-host TELNET servers.

     total server hosts 43 100%

  no New-Prot server 16 37%

  unknown status (new host) 2 5%

  total New-Prot implem. 25 58%

  New-Prot on 1 and 27,

  Old on socket 1 (2) 13 30%

  New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 8 19%

  New-Prot on 1 only (3) 4 9%

  Notes:

  * All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the list. What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 10 July 1975.

  (2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to all protocols and conventions, as I understand them.

  (3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs according to what control sequences are received.

  Tabulation of server status for all server sites:

  Host Number Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options

  (Oct) (Dec) Name 1 27 Implementated (if any)

  101 65 UCLA-CCN Old X

  201 129 UCLA-CCBS Old X

  102 66 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3

  3 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X

  4 4 UTAH-10 Old X

  305 197 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3

  106 70 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3

  206 134 MIT-AI New X I1,3; O3

  306 198 MIT-ML New X I1,3; O3

  7 7 RAND-RCC Old X

  107 71 RAND-ISD ? ?

  10 8 SDC-LAB Old X

  11 9 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3

  12 10 LL-67 New X None

  112 74 LL-TX-2 Old X

  13 11 SU-AI New* New* I1,3

  16 14 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3

  116 78 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3

  17 15 I4-TENEX Old X

  217 143 I4B-TENEX Old X

  20 16 AMES-67 New New None

  25 21 LLL-RISOS Old Old

  126 86 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3

  226 150 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3

  27 23 USC-44 Old X

  327 215 USC-ECL Old X

  32 26 SDAC-44 Old X

  34 28 ARPA-DMS Old X

  37 31 CCA-TENEX Old X

  40 32 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3

  43 35 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3

  344 228 HAWAII-500 Old X

  52 42 LONDON New New None

  53 43 OFFICE-1 Old New I1,3,6; O3

  54 44 MIT-MULTICS New New None

  55 45 SCI-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3

  56 46 RUTGERS-10 New New I1,3; O3

  61 49 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3

  361 241 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3

  162 114 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3

  364 244 USC-ISIC Old New I1,3,6; O3

  67 55 ANL ? ?

  70 56 SUMEX-AIM Old New I1,3,6; O3

  Key: X No server at this socket

   Status not ascertained-unable to connect to host

  I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #")

  O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #")

  (# is option number in new Protocol, Options in tabulation:

  0 Transmit-Binary 1 Echo

  3 Suppress-Go-Ahead 6 Timing-Mark)

  Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option requests.

  [ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]

  [ into the online RFCarchives by Alex McKenzie with ]

  [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ]

    • 评论
    • 分享微博
    • 分享邮件
    邮件订阅

    如果您非常迫切的想了解IT领域最新产品与技术信息,那么订阅至顶网技术邮件将是您的最佳途径之一。

    重磅专题
    往期文章
    最新文章